March 15, 2012

NEXT POST
Article: FuturistSpeaker.com – A Study of Future Trends and Predictions by Futurist Thomas Frey » Blog Archive » When Wikipedia No Longer Matters Some very interesting stats and arguments by Thomas Frey, below - totally fits my view that Wikipedia is derailing. Of course, I would have a solid reason to say that: they removed my entry last year citing that there was not enough merit to be listed here. Says who exactly? Ouch.FuturistSpeaker.com – A Study of Future Trends and Predictions by Futurist Thomas Frey » Blog Archive » When Wikipedia No Longer Matters http://www.futuristspeaker.com/2011/06/when-wikipedia-no-longer-matters/?cb= For this reason Wikipedia set out to become credible and they implemented a number of procedures to add rigor and validation to every entry. They removed any entries that seemed frivolous or self-serving, and in doing so, they created an invisible league of gatekeepers, not unlike what you’d find at top newspapers, to determine the worthiness of every post. During the early years, volunteers who found writing and editing for Wikipedia to be the worthy cause missing from their life showed up in droves. But once too many rules and restrictions came into play, the fun had vanished and it started feeling like work again. According to a 2009 article in the Wall Street Journal, “More than 49,000 editors left Wikipedia’s English-language edition during the first three months of 2009, compared with only 4,900 for the same quarter a year earlier.” Get my free iPhone & Android apps http://mobileroadie.com/apps/Futurist

Gerd Leonhard

Keynote Speaker, Think-Tank Leader, Futurist, Author & Strategist, Idea Curator, some say Iconoclast | Heretic, CEO TheFuturesAgency, Visiting Prof FDC Brazil, Green Futurist

The Futures Agency
steve
techonomy
Alan Edgett
The Typepad Team
David Rosen

Recent Comments