MediaFuturist

Content 2.0: 'protection' is in the business model not the technology (thoughts on the future of selling content)

Fueled by the music industry's ongoing turmoils and, finally, books going digital at a very rapid pace, there is a lot of debate on how to deal with the fact that many people habitually share i.e. redistribute digital content without any of the upstream users making their own payment. How can you monetize content when the copy is free?

This question is a key issue across the board, whether it's in music, eBooks, news, publishing, TV or movies. The fear is, of course, that once a digital item has been purchased by one person it can be easily forwarded to anyone else if it is in an open format, thus seriously reducing the possibility that someone else will actually pay real $ for it, as well (of course, the same is true for supposedly locked or protected digital content as well - it just takes a bit longer). No more control over distribution = no more money. Right?

Despite the plain fact that DRM has proven disastrous in digital music (and now is pretty much history), technical protection measures are still being investigated as a plausible method of securing payment, especially in the exploding eBook sector. This worries me greatly because technical protection measure are expensive, hinder or prevent mass-scale adoption, curtail or kill social sharing which defeats user-to-user marketing, often drastically limit fair use, and are by and large useless when trying to thwart the real pirates i.e. those that have malicious, criminal intentions of stealing content in order to sell it to others.

Not just content - Context! In my view, the thinking that the distribution of content must be controlled to achieve any kind of reasonable payment is fundamentally flawed because of this not-so-futuristic realization: in an open, digitally networked economy (note: I am talking about today, not tomorrow!) content publishers need to offer their goods in a way that no longer centers on distribution being the key factor. It should not (only) be the content that is sold (i.e. the mere 0s and 1s) but the context, the added values, the many others items around the content. Sell what can't be copied.

 The irrefutable trend is that the window of opportunity of 'selling copies' (i.e. iTunes, eMusic, Kindle etc) is rapidly closing, at least in most developed countries. The next, and very much already-present opportunity is in selling access and added-value services, and in providing content-related experiences.

Once we embrace that the users -the people formerly known as consumers- can't be reduced to just being 'buyers of copies' we can investigate how they would want to pay for everything else, as well. For example, when buying an eBook users shouldn't merely pay for the authorized distribution i.e. the legitimate copy of the words but they could also gain access to highly curated commentary, known peers and friends that may also read this book, ratings, explanations, slide-shows, images, links, videos, cross-references, direct connections with the author or the publisher and so on. Yes: connect with fans + reasons to buy (as Mike Masnick of Techdirt has succinctly summarized many times before).

In this model, as a legitimate user, I would also get valuable context when I pay. I would get engagement, conversation, relevance, personalization, meaning... i.e. really valuable benefits to me as a person, not just a dumb, anonymous recipient of free zeros and ones. I don't get these benefits just because I get a free copy via email, Rapidshare, BitTorrent or some drop-box on the Net, because it is stripped bare of everything that really matters to me. This is the key to the future of monetizing content, and it will take many different shapes and forms depending on the content, and the culture that surrounds it.

 For example, in music, it is very likely that streaming-on-demand (and the temporary buffering i.e. offline playing of those streams) will be 'free' i.e. bundled and packaged by 3rd parties, while the context and those many added values will not. If I want a high-definition version of my favorite opera or that Blue Note Jazz Club concert from last night I can buy a premium package that provides it. If I want to share my personal play-lists, ratings  and comments with my Facebook friends, and get access to their content, I can add the 'social network option' to my package. If the price is right, I'll buy (btw: this relates directly to why people buy virtual items - perception of value, and purchase after deep engagement - see my Farmville/Facebook example: they sell 800.000 virtual tractors per day;).

As to pricing and making 'buying' irresistible: imagine if a download of a song would cost only $ 0.10 - would anyone still bother to scour the web to find badly ripped, virus-laced tracks for free? Yes, I know, that price point sounds ridiculous if you used to sell CDs for 20 Euros a pop but the argument for much cheaper access to digital content that is offered in open (i.e. copy-able) formats is really quite simple: if you can get 95% of the users to buy at a much lower price, and make them so happy they will do the marketing for you (i.e. share links;), instead of getting 5% of the market to buy an expensive product that they can't really share with anyone (i.e. iTunes music or Kindle eBooks), then you should be doing just fine. This has been my chief argument for proposing the music flat rate during the past 10+ years, and I think it still holds water (in fact, it seems to be proving itself with the recent developments at Spotify, MOG etc).

And yes: selling at a much lower price but much higher volume only makes sense if the low-priced (or flat-rated), access-based offerings actually connect directly to a multitude of up-selling possibilities, such as multimedia versions of eBooks, high-definition versions of radio shows, albums or concerts, in-depth analysis and audio/video commentary for news etc.

In most content industries, I think the key is to offer a wipe-out, ueber-attractive way to get started at an irresistible price-point, and then convert most of those happy users to other offerings at a much higher price.

Pricing and value: getting the new formulas right. It all comes down to pricing and values - and many decision makers in the incumbent content industry will need to accept who will set those prices i.e. who will be in charge of value perceptions: not them, but the users. Hard stop. Reality check.

If you agree that the sharing of content cannot really be stopped, and that therefore the value of a mere digital copy of content will invariably decline, we must urgently re-think how we address the issue monetizing sharing, and what we can do to create and nurture those new values - the New Generatives - that will replenish those that used to be derived from being able to control distribution.

Added values, all the time. The metrics of the content industries need to shift from getting a copy to rewarding engagement. As an example, let's assume I have just purchased and downloaded a movie in an open file format, and I have a hunch that 50 of my close friends would also enjoy it. I post the movie on my iDisk shared files folder (anyone on .mac can do this) and send the link to everyone. Now, if the only value of the movie is in having received a 'copy without paying', then my friends have received the movie's entire value 'for free'. But if the value of this movie is also in the user / viewer being part of something much larger than mere 0s and 1s, i.e. a conversation or another environment of added values that are available to each individual viewer because they actually purchased access to the movie, then the mere sharing of the file is not going to be very attractive, for the upstream users will not have access to all these other values.

Imagine, then, if a legitimate movie buyer (or more likely, bundled-access-user) would also receive access to a select group of fellow users - and, crucially, representatives of the creators, producers or distributors - that would provide a myriad of additional values such as viewing exclusive, movie-related pictures, slideshows and short clips with the actors, locations or props used in the film, or getting special offers for related products such as books, games, merchandise or even HD versions of the same film, or unlocking new features within the very same file that are otherwise hidden (something that could easily be done within a mobile application, for example)... that is where it starts getting interesting. 

Combined with a no-brainer price point, having a constant flow of added values available to legitimate customers would turn file-sharing into a marketing vehicle, i.e. surely I could somehow watch the movie 'for free' but would be barred from all that other cool stuff that I would have access to if I only paid my $2, myself.

The crowd and the cloud: new monetization possibilities not based on Control. Content hosting is moving from my own computer and my hard-drives to the cloud - and indeed, this is very good news for content creators, publishers and rights-holders because if makes it easy to engage and up-sell to the new generatives. In addition, it is reasonable to expect that content files will get larger and larger over the next few years, since many devices are now capable to handle much better resolutions and many users are tiring of bad audio, video and image quality. The age of squashed-sounding MP3s is ending as high-end audio is becoming a reality even in the smallest devices. Assuming those 2 trends (people receiving bigger and better files as well as accessing those files in the cloud rather than storing it on any specific piece of hardware), the key question is what 'sharing' will look like in the near future and what can be done to monetize it rather than try to curtail it.

The answer is in the cloud: I think many people will soon stop sharing the actual media files (since they are getting larger and larger, and therefore more unwieldy) and will share only the links, the bookmarks, the metadata or the tags, if the result is the same, i.e. if the shared content is made fully available to the recipient, without further ado or unwieldy registration procedures, buy-now pitches etc. How could this work? 

 Imagine you have purchased an ebook for 10 Euros and you want to share it with your wife so that she can read it to you while you drive, or with your son because he really should know about this great book. With a good, old-fashioned printed, dead-tree book, this is certainly not an issue, so why should it be such a problem for the electronic version? Why not create and deploy many extra values around this book (such as video, audio, images, slideshows, dictionaries etc), make the file a lot larger, and then still allow a buyer to share the book via a simple link or bookmark that provides all recipients with the  basic, 'words-only' version of the book but withholds the added values until they purchase it for a very low and attractive price, themselves? Once those added values become a significant part of the user experience most users will not want to miss them - protection will be in the business model, not the software!

The perfect testing scenario may unfold soon, exemplified by Apple's new iPad. Extending the concept mentioned above, rather than blocking my wife from sharing an eBook it would be much more reasonable if I could still read the book, 'for free', but all else would not be available without a micro-transaction on my end, i.e. I would not have instant access to videos, links, ratings... i.e. that valuable context. This would clearly drive me to purchase a 'copy' myself - if indeed I like the book enough - sounds like a fair deal to me.

Engagement, interactivity, conversation and a constant stream of added values that can be produced at very low cost is what will give content owners 'protection' from rampant free-loading - not DRM,  region-coding or HADOPI laws.

Sharism and Money. When thinking about digital music (my original, futurist starting point), imagine an unlimited music service at a feels-like-free price, supported by advertising, brand sponsorships, ISPs / Telecoms and mobile operators. A service that allows me to stream or download the music, and enjoy it online or offline (pretty soon, a rather pointless distinction, anyway). A service that is basically cloud-based but that allows me to make temporary sub-clouds on my personal device so that I can always get to what I like the most, much like the gMail offline reader, mobile RSS readers, the Instapaper iPhone app etc. While I may be inclined to share some of the music files with my friends, I would be highly unlikely to publish the complete access details to my personal cloud via, say, Twitter - I would risk watering down my profile and messing up my entire personalization efforts.  Avoiding profile and account 'pollution' can be a major driver of payment adoption, I think.

Similarly, in books: let's assume, as a publisher, you'd allow people to log-in and get digital access to 10s of 1000s of books, at a low price (such as O'Reilly's Safari Books already does, for all those hardcore programmers and geeks around the world) - what would keep people from just sharing the log-in details and only pay for one account but have 2000 people getting everything for free?  The answer: once I am really involved with a platform I like, and use every day, I am not very likely to share the account details with everyone, because I don't want my profile to be polluted, and my own experience to be negatively effected. 

This is similar to having your family members use your eBay account for bidding on stuff they want to buy: not a good idea, since it will be your rating (which is the real currency of eBay) that will be negatively effected if your 15 year old son does not live up to the buyer's expectation on his last transaction. The same is true for Amazon: share your log-in details with your 12 year old daughter and you will make a mess out of your recommendations - she may love SuBo (Susan Boyle) but you don't want to keep seeing pitches for  stuff she may want, for the next 9 months.

The bottom line: content sharing isn't the real problem: high price points, outmoded toll-booth strategies, broken relationships and processes, low values, bad technology and service, and lack of conversation and engagement are. 
 
 


Here is my message to publishers and content owners: lower the prices to the point of unanimous excitement, use open standards that work for everyone, everywhere; bundle and package as attractively as you can (then: repeat). Remove all reasons that your users may have to avoid the toll-booth, and thereby side-step the conversion to 'paid'. The lower the hurdle for legitimate usage and paid engagement, the less you will have to worry about 'competing with free free'.

And do it now so you don't have to win people back from routing around you.

Image below via Somaya on Flickr (thanks!!)

Related articles by Zemanta

• Amazon Allows Some Publishers and Authors to Opt Out of E-Book DRM (readwriteweb.com)

My presentation on "Content 2.0 - Monetization Examples" at MidemNet 2010

 Below is the PDF from the presentation I just did at Midem 2010 in Cannes / France (Sunday January 24, 2010, 5.30 pm). My MidemNet blog posts are here, and my presentation "Compensation not Control" from MIDEM 2009 is here. Please click through to the Slideshare site to download the PDF if desired. The video is now available, here, as well. Download: Content 2.0 Gerd Leonhard at MidemNet 2010 Public PDF 15MB

Related articles by Zemanta

• Free...Feels-Like-Free...Freemium...? What in the world...? (mediafuturist.com)
• New Content Logic: my presentation at TACD / Paris Accord Meetings (mediafuturist.com)
• The Future of Media: Open, Mobile, Connected, Collaborative (presentation at MPJC 2009) (mediafuturist.com)
• The Price of Free - Reinventing the Online Economy, now in Greek! (mediafuturist.com)
• The Future of Digital Content - Free vs Paid? My presentation at Tokyo 2.0 August 24 2009 (mediafuturist.com)
• Music Like Water and the Public Digital Music License: my presentation at A2N in Berlin (mediafuturist.com)

Content 2.0: finding new ways to generate revenues

View more documents from Gerd Leonhard.

Panik vor Piraten: Gerd Leonhard on Swiss TV SF1 "Kulturplatz" (on eBooks and Music)

This video is in German language - thanks to Swiss TV SF1 for making this available! If your German is not good enough... watch this video "Compensation not Control" on very much the same topic. My Youtube channel is here, btw. The Blip.TV version is here. Read this post on what I think Book Publishers should do.

Related articles by Zemanta

• My presentation at Start09: Future of Cultural Industries (in German) (mediafuturist.com)
• Music Like Water and the Public Digital Music License: my presentation at A2N in Berlin (mediafuturist.com)
• Crowdsourcing is real: German Translation of my RSA essay "The Price of Freedom - Reinventing the Online Economy" (mediafuturist.com)

Tim O'Reilly on Safari Books Online: a Cloud Library as an alternate model for ebooks (and other key learnings for online content)

Image via Wikipedia

Back in October 09, Tim O'Reilly ( someone that I really admire for his cutting-edge and very wise thinking on the future of content and technology) published a very important piece on ebook publishing, on the occasion of the Safari eBook portal relaunch.

I think that most of us working in the content industries can learn a lot from this post, no matter if it's about books, magazines, news, music, film or software. I will therefore summarize his most important bottom lines, below, and provide some comments and context where needed.

• "Recent releases of O'Reilly ebooks as iPhone applications have even outsold the same books in print" Comment: in my view, this trend will happen with most business books, and text books, in the next 2-3 years (beyond the iPhone, of course, i.e. for all kinds of mobile devices)
• "Most people thinking about ebooks are focused on creating an electronic recreation of print books, complete with downloadable files and devices that look and feel like books. This is a bit like pointing a camera at a stage play and concluding that was the essence of filmmaking" Comment: this is a crucial point - publishers and distributors urgently need to let go of the idea of merely recreating offline sales models online.
• "Everything is always in sync because your library is in the cloud; an ebook cloud works the same way the web itself works. It provides ubiquitous access and shared experience" Comment: amen. indeed.
• "One of our mottos at O’Reilly is to "create more value than you capture."

And from Tim's 1995 (!) piece Publishing Models for Internet Commerce, here are some more morsels:

"Some of the characteristics of the print publishing market:

• Barriers to entry are low. Especially with the advent of desktop publishing, almost anyone can produce a book, a magazine, a newsletter.

• Niches abound. Over 50,000 books are published each year in the U.S. alone. A major bookselling chain such as Borders keeps literally hundreds of thousands of unique titles in inventory. And despite major industry consolidation,and focus on a small number of bestsellers, there are still thousands of publishers, ranging in size from those who publish only a single book to those who publish thousands. What's more, there are about 3500 general circulation magazines and tens of thousands of newsletters and other limited circulation publications.

• So do business models. Books are sold "by the piece." They are also available for free in the library, though in limited circulation. Magazines and newspapers may be had for free (perhaps subsidized by advertising or membership), for a single-copy newsstand price, or for a recurring subscription fee. Prices range from a few dollars to hundreds or even thousands of dollars for specialized newsletters.

• No one "owns" the market, or needs to. A bestselling book might sell a million copies or so. The largest circulation magazine in the country, the AARP's membership magazine, has a circulation of about 7 million, Reader's Digest about 5 million. No one else comes close. It's possible to have a successful book selling only a few thousand copies, a newsletter a few hundred, and a four color magazine a few tens of thousands.

• The same technology is available to everyone...

• There is a rich ecology of mutually successful players. Authors sell to publishers. Publishers screen material, edit and produce it to add value, develop a marketing campaign, and build a network of distribution relationships to get the book to the ultimate consumer. Publishers may sell books directly to the consumer, through major retailers, and through wholesalers to smaller retailers whom they don't serve directly....

• Access is universal and non-exclusive..."

via radar.oreilly.com

If you are in the content business, be sure to read his entire post, and watch his 2009 Web2.0 video, here. There sure is a ton of stuff to chew on. Enjoy.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Book publishers: please learn from the mistakes of the music industry - my thoughts on what to do (mediafuturist.com)
• New Content Logic: my presentation at TACD / Paris Accord Meetings (mediafuturist.com)
• The Future of Digital Content and the coming Tele-Media Ecosystem (my presentation at Telco2.0 conference) (mediafuturist.com)
• The Future of Media & ICT (Bilisim Zervis 2009) (slideshare.net)
• Attention, Money and the Future of the Internet (Gerd Leonhard at Internet Hungary) (slideshare.net)
• Is Book Sharing Really a Threat to Publishing? [Voices] (voices.allthingsd.com)

Some eBook industry 'leaders' are starting to sound exactly like the music industry 5 years ago

I just read this very interesting piece in PaidContent.org (one of my favorite sites): "Steve Haber, president of Sony’s Digital Reading Business Division... at the MediaBistro eBook Summit... decried the emphasis on the $9.99 price point for e-books. “The $9.99 price point is not a money-maker,” he said. “Certain bestsellers are sold at that price for retail, competitive reasons. But you need to have a range. You could go from $10 to $20 even to $100 for an e-book. There’s no sweet spot and it’s certainly not $9.99. When you walk into a bookstore and there are a range of prices. It should be the same for an e-book store.” Haber went on to defend the use of DRM, which he doesn’t see going away for awhile. “You need an orderly process to sell books and DRM makes that possible, mainly because it allows content creators and distributors to make money from that content"

Ouch. Have you not learned anything from happened in digital music during the past 10 years - where have you been hiding? Let me summarize it for you:

DRM is a total - and much discussed - nuisance and significant deterrent to legal consumer behavior, and it does ZERO to prevent sharing of copyrighted content online. DRM just turns users that have legal, fair and honest intentions into guinea pigs for digital rights protection schemes thought up by people who still have their emails printed for them. Wake up: protection is in the business model - not in technology. I may even concede that DRM may work in some (but increasingly rare) cases, but for books and for music...? No chance. Imho, you have to be kidding if you think these kinds of remote-controlled-rights schemes will make you any money in the future. In my opinion, anyone that still talks about DRM being a chief part of their eBook strategy should consider taking a longer vacation, and do some serious reading and thinking (sure... you could start with my own new book "Friction is Fiction" - ask me for the free PDF if needed; )

Face it: the price point for digital books has to be lower - much lower - than the price point for a real i.e. dead-tree, printed, shipped, physical book. Just because you can't seem to figure out how to reduce your costs across the board, start to add significant value in new areas and still turn a profit, that does not mean consumers will massively adopt eBook-reading at those price points (Kindle etc) or even above (as seems to be suggested above).

This looks like a very lame 
rerun of the classic and most disturbing mistakes of the music industry: the incumbent market leaders really thought they could actually increase their margin as well as their ability to control the usage (!) when selling music online, i.e. have much lower distribution and marketing costs, keep the artists down to the same old, tiny percentage, and - yes ! - increase the prices on a per-track basis.

Ask yourself this simple question: what would have happened if a download had been priced at $0.20 or even 10 cents per track (or even, yes, a flat-rate), instead of $1 - would anyone still have bothered to try and download it for free, somewhere else? Could the value of those active, engaged and happy buyers be captured, and then be extended to other things you can sell them? Clearly, the answer is YES. 

This is my message to the eBook industry and the publishers: do not head into the ill-fated direction of wanting to sell digital content for the same price as the physical content (or even above...ouch) - it is a pipe-dream!

Instead, make eBooks drastically cheaper, offer unique bundles and compilations, add new values all the time (cross-media anyone?), invent new packages (think mobile), and stop focusing on just selling UNITS. Flip the pricing logic before it flips you: lower prices, infinitely more engaged and legal users, and new Generatives on top!

Finally, here is something that wasn't touched on at Paid Content but that is crucial: If you think that the traditional deals with the authors will carry over into the eBook environment you are deeply mistaken. Witness what happened with Random House's eBook initiative, here. The authors (and their agents!) will need to be brought in as PARTNERS not minor players, as they have been in the past. Accept, adapt and move forward.

 

Related articles by Zemanta

• Book publishers: please learn from the mistakes of the music industry - my thoughts on what to do (mediafuturist.com)
• Is Book Sharing Really a Threat to Publishing? [Voices] (voices.allthingsd.com)
• I just ordered the new 'International' Kindle eReader: the reading revolution has started! (mediafuturist.com)
• AMBC Music Conference: Kevin Burmeister and the new Altnet / Kazaa - back to the stone ages of digital content? Deep packet inspection? DRM? R u Serious? (mediafuturist.com)
• Publishers Getting The Wrong Message Over eBook Piracy (techdirt.com)

Announcing my new book on Lulu: "Friction is Fiction" - write a review and get the free PDF!

I have been very busy compiling my best essays, blog posts and other writings from the past 3 years, and have finally uploaded the most recent version to Lulu (my favorite print-on-demand book store). The new book is now called 'Friction is Fiction' and is available in 3 versions:  1) 158 pages, 6x9 inches / U.S. trade format, full-color, for $60.40, here (yes, it's quite pricey because of the cost of printing 4-color, on-demand)  2) the same dead-tree version, but in black & white only, for $19.98, here (much cheaper but a lot less cool;) 3) as a PDF, for a token price of $7.50, here.

I would be delighted if you would consider buying whatever works best for you - what better Christmas present could you possibly think of!   Please note that this book will be updated every 3 months, to include my latest writings. If you want to share the book page please just send people to www.frictionisfiction.com - thanks.

As to giving away the free PDF, here is the deal: you can contact me anytime (via email, Facebook or Twitter) to request a free copy of the PDF if you just don't want to (or can't) spend the $7.50, and I will send you the download link. In return, what I ask from you is to pay me with attention, i.e. to write a review on Lulu, a blog-post, or a tweet about my book, with a link (all 3 is best;). Deal?

As to the title: I used to simply call this compilation 'The Best of Media Futurist' but while looking through all those posts - and spending a lot more time revising them - I found an important thread that goes through almost all of it and which therefore has become the new title: Friction is Fiction. So what does that mean? It means that if you are currently basing your success on maintaining or even constructing hurdles, difficulties or other bottlenecks somewhere in the system - i.e. if there is something that impedes the flow of information, or a transaction or purchase so that a higher price point or some other form of control over the can be obtained - then you are very likely to face diminishing revenues in the next few years. Building obstacles for users (fka consumers) used to work just fine but... no longer. Building walls is the fastest road to suicide in the digital economy.

The web has been utterly ruthless about finding these glaring points of friction, such as paying for eMail (remember that?), paying a ton of money for long-distance phone calls (remember those pre-skype days?), or consumers not having any access to travel booking systems, flight information or seating. These hurdles are being removed, one-by-one, and those 'people formerly known as consumers' are getting more powerful every single day. Banking on friction to increase your revenues has become like throwing matches into the river and asking it to stop - it's useless.

Friction was, of course, the main money-maker in the media, entertainment and content business, for a long time: certain CDs were only available in certain stores at certain times in certain countries, DVDs with those movies you really wanted were only available in certain countries and within certain 'windows', books had to be printed and shipped, and ring-tones could only be purchased from your operator.  Basically, at every turn the consumer encountered have-to's  and must's which essentially allowed a substantial level of control by the media and content companies - and thus, higher prices. In many cases, the more friction the higher the price you could ask for.

No longer. Read the book!

Related: my blog-book "The End of Control": download the first 6 chapters here. Also: My Music 2.0 book is available via Lulu, here

Related articles by Zemanta

• Free mobile version of my Music 2.0 book for iPhone, Android and Blackberry (mediafuturist.com)
• Ericsson report: Telecom crucial for new media business... says Media Futurist;) (mediafuturist.com)
• Video of my presentation at A2N Berlin: Music Like Water - the time is now! (mediafuturist.com)
• The Mobility Revolution and the Power of Social Media (presentation at the ACTE09 conference in Prague) (mediafuturist.com)

The Future of Media: mobile, social and... PAID? Video from Mobile Monday Munich

This just went up on the Mobile Monday channel: video of my presentation at Mobile Monday Munich (Nov 30, 2009)

Related articles by Zemanta

• Starting a new venture with Jonathan MacDonald: Indicatr provides Insights for Investors (mediafuturist.com)
• My presentation at the NSN Marketing Forum 2009: Telemedia Opportunities (mediafuturist.com)
• Music Like Water and the Public Digital Music License: my presentation at A2N in Berlin (mediafuturist.com)

Some of my 'bottom lines' on the Future of Content

www.flickr.com gleonhard's Bottom lines photoset

Related articles by Zemanta

• The Future of Content in 140 Characters: Music=404, Ctrl=MiA, TeleMedia>6Y and GWHTLC ! (mediafuturist.com)
• Seven Weeks Into the Future (futurist.com)
• Content: the past, and the future - we must challenge our assumptions (mediafuturist.com)

Indicatr hunch: Instapaper iPhone (read webpages on your iPhone, offline)

 Further to Monday's announcement on my new venture, Indicatr, here is a new video about the amazing, 'green' and addictive Instapaper iPhone app. I blogged about this last year but it just keeps getting better - no more printing for me; I just bookmark all those cool webpages and read them offline on my iPhone or Kindle. More Indicatr hunches are here.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Format War Clouds E-Book Horizon [Voices] (voices.allthingsd.com)
• Bookmark Away: Instapaper Comes Up With A New Way To Work With The Kindle (techcrunch.com)
• New mobile lifestreaming page now available: get all my shared stuff on your mobile device (mediafuturist.com)

The Future of Digital Content and the coming Tele-Media Ecosystem (my presentation at Telco2.0 conference)

It was a pleasure and a privilege to be invited to the Telco2.0 Executive Brainstorm event in London, today, and to address a roomful of telecom  & media executives that were - as it says in the conference tagline - looking for a way to 'reduce the friction in the digital economy'. After having to listen to some rather bizarre and, sadly, rather 'retro' justifications about why those pesky Internet users and Digital Natives (i.e. our kids) really do need to be threatened with disconnection from the Net if they don't comply with the rules of yesterday's game, delivered with great pathos by the usual lobbyists from UKMusic and Universal Music Group executives (see the list of panelists below), I tried to get down to the bottom line of what the workable alternatives to their Control & Enforcement paradigms could be.

Funny thing is, that in the subsequent vote most people in the audience seemed to actually agree that disconnection and punishment are not going to change anything and are not a suitable path to new revenues... I always wonder why there seems to be strong consensus if people vote (or talk) individually, but if you hear them 'in public' everyone always delivers the good old party line of wanting more control and protection. Why is that? Whose bread we eat whose song we sing... is that it?

I will post a summary here, shortly. In the meantime, here is the slideshow (download the PDF via slideshare).  A

Enjoy and spread the word.

The Future of Tele-Media and Digital Content (Telco2.0 Conference)

View more documents from Gerd Leonhard.

Related articles by Zemanta

• New Content Logic: my presentation at TACD / Paris Accord Meetings (mediafuturist.com)
• Free...Feels-Like-Free...Freemium...? What in the world...? (mediafuturist.com)
• The Mobility Revolution and the Power of Social Media (presentation at the ACTE09 conference in Prague) (mediafuturist.com)
• The Future of Digital Content - Free vs Paid? My presentation at Tokyo 2.0 August 24 2009 (mediafuturist.com)

The Future of Social Media: audio & video of my presentation at PICNIC09 in Amsterdam

PICNIC09 was a fantastic event and I really enjoyed being there; see my previous blogpost and PDF / Slideshare here.  For those of you that regularly cruise on the Autobahn or spend a lot of time in the gym: the audio-only / MP3 version is here. If you prefer Youtube to Vimeo, the GerdTube.com i.e. Youtube versions are available now, too (yes... chopped up in those required 10 minute chunks): Part 1, Part 2, Part 3.

PICNIC '09: The Future of Social Media with Gerd Leonhard from PICNICCrossmediaweek on Vimeo.

The Blip.tv version (use the full-screen option!)

Related articles by Zemanta

• New mobile lifestreaming page now available: get all my shared stuff on your mobile device (mediafuturist.com)
• The Mobility Revolution and the Power of Social Media (presentation at the ACTE09 conference in Prague) (mediafuturist.com)
• Creating value with Content: The Future of Marketing and Advertising (my Sydney presentation) (mediafuturist.com)
• Audio version of my Authors at Google Talk: the Future of Content - the End of Control (mediafuturist.com)
• New Content Logic: my presentation at TACD / Paris Accord Meetings (mediafuturist.com)

Book publishers: please learn from the mistakes of the music industry - my thoughts on what to do

I just received my new Kindle - the so-called International Edition - and as a result I have started to investigate the most recent electronic book developments. Apart from the Kindle (which I like but whose economic proposition is quite mad, frankly), I also own various Sony Readers and am a heavy Instapaper app user on the iPhone; I use it to read 100s of book-marked web-pages offline, saving 1000s of pages that I used to print.

Looking at what some large book publishers are starting to say about their digital strategies I have been getting a bit worried about a potential repeat of what happened in the music industry, i.e. of trying to keep or even expand 'control over distribution' while attempting a fruitful switch to a digital distribution model. In other words, many publishers seem intent upon using the advent of digital distribution as a way of fixing the 'flaws' of physical media (such as the CD or the book which can easily be traded, shared or lend to someone else).  Well, the reality is that in this new digital ecosystem, attaining total control is an impossible mission - and this flawed world view, I think, is main reason behind the global demise of the recorded music industry.

So here, below, is a summary of what I think non-fiction book publishers could learn from the digital music disaster that has been playing out in front of our eyes (and ears) for the past 10 years. Please note that in my opinion, the distinction between fiction and non-fiction publishing is crucial, because we must take socio-cultural contexts, existing user-habits and consumers UI (user-interface) preferences into account.

For one thing, I think that readers of business books are much more likely to adopt eBooks because they are often reading several books at the same time, annotate and bookmark heavily, skip chapters or like to search inside a book - all of which is becoming quite easy to do with the new generation of eBook readers. And many of them like gadgets, too, so that's a good fit. However, people who read novels or other fiction are, in my view, less likely to quickly adopt eBooks on a large scale since the good old interface of printed books still represents a much better emotional i.e. 'touch-feel-smell' value to them.

Let me also point out that while I think book publishers can learn plenty from what happened in digital music, the two businesses are really quite different, and whatever we may discover from the music debacle cannot just be transferred to the eBooks space.

Taking this into account, here are my top 5 tips for book publishers:

1. Don't (just) sell the copy of the content - sell everything around it. In fact, consider making the mere 'copies of words' (i.e. the raw data, the file) a lot cheaper to obtain from authorized sources but also start creating and offering those added values that are only possible in this coming digital ecosystem. Start building - as Kevin Kelly says - those 'new generatives' that will, over time, probably make up 75% of your total revenues. What do I mean with that? Unique, non-copyable values such as context (e.g. being able to look up a definition of a word or phrase via Wikipedia, or find a precise topic from the book you are reading in other, related books), curation and packaging (e.g. being able to read 'the best' chapters of the top 25 business books in a single, new 'compilation', or having a book edited down to 20 pages or 3 hours of audio so that I can save time and read  / hear only the essential stuff), immediacy (e.g. getting the book delivered at the very moment that the last word has been written or edited), and social relevance (e.g. see what my peers are saying about this book, and what comments they may have shared). The exciting thing is that eBooks don't have to be linear any longer - now, they can be linked, amended and interwoven; and guess what: no-one but the author and the publisher can provide these kinds of values. Read my lips i.e. tweets:  Unique experiences by unique creators cannot be pirated. Imagine 10s of 1000s of people buying the basic eBook for a very low price but then 30% of them opting to pay an additional 'fan & follower' subscription fee to get all the updates, comments, links, videos and audio versions as well. My advise: look at the initial sale of 'the copy' only as the mere starting point rather than the only way to monetize, look beyond the mere copy. With eBooks, the copy is just the tip of the iceberg. 
2. Don't focus on protection: focus on engagement, on attraction, on enabling followers not pushing enforcement. Realize that the more you empower the user the more money (s)he will give you. Yes, that's the Google way. As trite as it may sound to some of you: in digital content, friction really is fiction: if you keep the price too high, if you don't offer a standardized and open platform, or if you impose burdensome technical restrictions then you simply will be pointing to, or shall we say, sending your customers to those countless illegitimate places where they can just download the free files without any of these hassles. You don't compete with free - you compete with better service, trust and added values!
3. Don't try to sell what's abundant - sell what is scarce. The 0s and 1s that make up a book's content are and will always be abundantly available to those savvy digital natives, and will be captured by those 'people formerly known as consumers', no matter what you may do to prevent it. No matter how much you hate the idea: copies of digital files are abundant, meaning... close to 'free' - and that's that. What can be sold - based on a powerful, legitimate, low-priced or bundled, ubiquitous, unrestricted and super-attractive access model - is the stuff that's actually scarce which includes my own time (a great example is how the 'Wired' guru and Longtail prophet Chris Anderson sells the edited audio version of his new book "Free" for $7.49 while the basic, long-form MP3 is free), powerful creation, extra services such as special audio and video versions, and so on.
4. Technical copy protection or so-called digital rights management measures (DRM/TPM) are guaranteed not to work unless they are 100% invisible and actually add value to the user experience - in which case they become more like CRM.  Most of the time, DRM is an insult to the legitimate buyers, and utterly useless in terms of actual protection simply because it is trying to solve a business problem with technological measures. It prevents (and insults) customer happiness and greatly deters future purchasing. It reduces sales and punishes those that actually do buy and pay real money for the content. Book publishers, repeat after me: DRM will cost you serious money to implement and it will do nothing to 'protect' your content. Remember: after a decade of stone-walling and criminalizing what consumers have always asked for, the big record labels have finally allowed most digital music retailers to remove the DRM and sell unprotected MP3s - and guess what: the retail of those MP3s has had zero impact on the issue of how many people 'file-share' music without permission. So, read my lips i.e. my RSS: the only protection you have is in the business model. Think bundles and flat-rates based on very personal, unlikely-to-share log-ins, the potential embedding of user-IDs and even some personal profile information into the purchase process as well as, possibly, into the file-metadata itself, and above all a powerful 'great price + service' policy that will make all those bad UI, lousy experience but free sharing sites obsolete. I also recommend to look at the concept of Social DRM.
5. There can only be one standard file format, and it needs to work on all devices. ePub looks good but DRM'ed ePub is a bad idea. As I said in my presentation at the eComm conference in Amsterdam, just yesterday: "the fastest way to economic suicide is to put walls around your content". Just like in digital music, where MP3 is what everyone has been using for the past 15 years, you need to go with an open, ubiquitous file format and not start a format war that will leave the consumers baffled and ill-served. The Kindle is nice, yes, but just like iTunes which is only now becoming DRM free it's a tightly walled garden that forces you to stay inside and enjoy yourself only within the existing confines. Now, for me, personally, if the pricing was drastically different maybe I wouldn't complain about the fact that I can't share these books, at all - maybe if I felt like I had some kind of real power as the consumer to influence how these economics works, maybe that would be OK. But the Kindle's paradigm is based on a 'take it or leave it' rule: expensive devices, delivery fees for each book that's purchased outside of the U.S., and eBook prices that are only slightly lower than the printed book...? This is certainly not going to get those digital natives excited about becoming a 'legal' user of eBooks.

The bottom line: don't worry so much about preventing sharing or copying. Offer more, cheaper, better and more connected services, get significantly more users at a much lower prices and re-invent your business model.

Related: Lending...2.0?

Related articles by Zemanta

• Why the e-reader market needs to kill DRM now (dvice.com)
• Is Book Sharing Really a Threat to Publishing? [Voices] (voices.allthingsd.com)
• Can E-Books Save Barnes & Noble? (businessweek.com)
• Open letter to Lord Mandelson: here is how to solve the Internet Music Problem - Legalize It! (mediafuturist.com)

Internet Hungary Presentation: Attention, Money and the Future of the Internet

I spoke at Internet Hungary in Tihany today (here is the event page), as promised here is a low-res version of the PDF, the high-res slideshare version is below (you can download the pdf via Slideshare). Topics: defining 'broadband culture', why and how exactly attention is the new currency, content 2.0 and the new pricing logic, the shift from mass media to niche media (masses of niches), why conversation beats monolog and why social media is - really - CRM, the shift from push to pull, 'free gets you to the place where you can ask to get paid' (Fred Wilson), how sharing generates income, the future of content, education trends, the end of control... and much more.

Attention, Money and the Future of the Internet (Gerd Leonhard at Internet Hungary)

View more documents from Gerd Leonhard.

Related articles by Zemanta

• The Future of Digital Content - Free vs Paid? My presentation at Tokyo 2.0 August 24 2009 (mediafuturist.com)
• The Future of eCommerce and Online Retailing (Versandhandel Kongress 2009 presentation) (mediafuturist.com)
• New video: Music 2.0 in 90 seconds (mediafuturist.com)
• The Future of Media: Open, Mobile, Connected, Collaborative (presentation at MPJC 2009) (mediafuturist.com)
• My presentation at Start09: Future of Cultural Industries (in German) (mediafuturist.com)
• The Future of Business in a connected world (my presentation at ACCJ Tokyo) (mediafuturist.com)
• The Future of Mobile Content (presentation at CMMA 09 in Singapore) (mediafuturist.com)
• Music Like Water and the Public Digital Music License: my presentation at A2N in Berlin (mediafuturist.com)
• Free...Feels-Like-Free...Freemium...? What in the world...? (mediafuturist.com)
• "Where Is It Going": new Twitter-based video show with Futurist Glen Hiemstra and Gerd Leonhard: ready for your questions (futurist.com)

Future of Media & ICT: presentation at Bilisim Zervisi 2009 (Istanbul)

I always enjoy coming to Istanbul and was delighted to be invited to do a keynote speech at this year's Bilisim Zervisi, the Turkish CeBit / CES equivalent. Some of the topics I covered include the top trends in media (fixed to mobile, top-down to social, consumers to users, physical to digital, one-way to interactive etc), the future of eBooks (and the new, international Amazon Kindle), why the solution for digital piracy is in the business model not in technology, the convergence of media, telecom, advertising, social networking, content & media, why telecoms and mobile operators must get involved with content and advertising. A Turkish review of my speech is here (no idea what it says, though).

The Future of Media & ICT (Bilisim Zervis 2009)

View more documents from Gerd Leonhard.

Related articles by Zemanta

• The Future of Digital Content - Free vs Paid? My presentation at Tokyo 2.0 August 24 2009 (mediafuturist.com)
• Mobile Marketing Futures: Data is the new Oil (my presentation at CMMA 09 in Singapore) (mediafuturist.com)
• Creating value with Content: The Future of Marketing and Advertising (my Sydney presentation) (mediafuturist.com)
• The Future of Mobile Content (presentation at CMMA 09 in Singapore) (mediafuturist.com)
• The Future of Business in a connected world (my presentation at ACCJ Tokyo) (mediafuturist.com)
• I just ordered the new 'International' Kindle eReader: the reading revolution has started! (mediafuturist.com)

The price of freedom: Reinventing the online economy (RSA Journal July 2009)

I was delighted to be invited to make a contribution to the RSA Journal's July 2009 edition, the printed version of which was just send out I believe, and the online edition that just went up on their website.

The complete title of my piece is: "The price of freedom - reinventing the online economy: Gerd Leonhard explains why ‘free’ content can still pay in the long term" and I really enjoyed writing this for them.

Following my last presentation at the RSA, in April 2009, on 'The Future of Content and Creativity' I have had many good conversations about this topic. The audio track from this event is here, btw; and the video is embedded again, below. Enjoy. And RT;)

I definitely recommend that you check out the other great features in the Juy 09 RSA journal, as well, there's some great gems in there.

Update (January 10, 2010):

English Version as downloadable PDF: Download RSA Gerd Summer 2009

German Translation by Rainer Classen : RSA German Translation: Preis der Freiheit

Spanish Translation by Carlos Perez Vellila: Spanish Price of Free RSA

Italian Translation by Federico Ciappi: Download Il prezzo della libertà RC1

You can read the entire thing on the RSA page, so here is just an excerpt:

"Free information, free music, free content and free media have been the promises of the internet (r)evolution since the humble beginnings of the World Wide Web and the Netscape IPO on 9 August 1995. What started out as the cumbersome sharing of simple text, grainy images and seriously compressed MP3s via online bulletin boards has now spread out to every single segment of the content industry – and even into ‘meatspace’ (real-life) services such as car rentals. Without a doubt, ‘free’ has become the default expectation of the young web-empowered digital natives and now the older generations are jumping in, too.

On top of the already disruptive force of the good old computer-based Web1.0, we are witnessing a global shift to mobile internet – a WWW that is, finally, so easy to use that even my grandmother can do it. While five years ago, we needed a ‘real’ computer tethered to a bunch of wires to port ourselves to this other place called ‘online’ and partake in global content swapping, now we just need a simple smart phone and a basic data connection. With a single click of a button, we’re in business – or rather, in freeloading mode. 

As users, we love ‘free’; as creators, many of us have come to hate the very thought. When access is de facto ownership, how can we still sell copies of our creations? Will we be stuck playing gigs while our music circles the globe on social networks, or blogging (now: tweeting) our heart out without even a hint of real money coming our way?

Daunting as it may seem, we can no longer stick with the pillars of Content1.0, such as the so-called fixed mechanical rate that US music publishers are currently getting ‘per copy’ of a song ($0.091). Nobody knows what really defines a copy any longer when the web’s equivalent of a copy (the on-demand play of that song on digital networks) may be occurring hundreds of millions of times per day. No advertiser, no ISP and not even Google has this kind of money to pay the composer (or rather, the publisher), at least not until the advertisers start bringing at least 30–50 per cent of their global US$1 trillion marketing and advertising budgets to the table.

Traditional expectations and pre-internet licensing agreements are exactly what are holding up YouTube’s deals with the music rights organisations such as PRS and GEMA: this is what the rights organisations used to get paid for the music that is being copied, and this is what they want to get paid now. This impasse is causing significant friction in our media industries worldwide. Yet, below the top-line issue of money, there lurks an even more significant paradigm shift: the excruciating switch from a centralised system of domination and control to a new ecosystem based on open and collaborative models. This is the shift from monopolies and cartels to interconnected platforms where partnership and revenue sharing are standard procedures. In most countries, copyright law gives creators complete and unfettered control to say yes or no to the use of their work. Rights-holders have been able to rule the ecosystem and, accordingly, ‘my way or the highway’ has been the quintessential operating paradigm of most large content companies for the past 50 years.

Enter the internet: now the highway has become the road of choice for 95 per cent of the population, the attitude of increasing the price by playing hard to get is rendered utterly fruitless. Like it or not, a refusal to give permission for our content to be legally used because we just don’t like the terms (or the entity asking for a licence) will just be treated as ‘damage’ on the digital networks, and the traffic will simply route around it. The internet and its millions of clever ‘prosumers’, inventors and armies of collaborators will find a way to use our creations, anyway. Yes, we can sue Napster, Kazaa or The PirateBay and we can whack ever more moles as we go along. We can pay hundreds of millions of dollars to our lawyers and industry lobbyists – but none of this will help us to monetise what we create. The solution is not a clever legal move, and it’s not a technical trick (witness the disastrous use and now total demise of Digital Rights Management in digital music). The solution is in the creation of new business models and the adoption of a new economic logic that works for everyone; a logic that is based on collaboration, on co-engagement and on, dare we mention it, mutual trust – an ecosystem not an egosystem. Once we accept this, we can start to discover the tremendous possibilities that a networked content economy can bring to us.  

Free, feels-like-free and freemium

Much has been written on the persistent trend towards free content on the net. It is crucial that we distinguish between the different terms so that we can develop new revenue models around all of them. ‘Free’ means nobody gets paid in hard currency – content is given away in return for other considerations, such as a larger audience, viral marketing velocity or increased word of mouth (or mouse). I may be receiving payment in the form of attention, but that isn’t going to be very useful when it’s time to pay my rent or buy dinner for my kids. Free is... well, unpaid, in real-life terms.

 ‘Feels-like-free’, on the other hand, means that real money is being generated for the creators while their content is being consumed – but the user considers it free. The payment may be made (ie sponsored or facilitated) by a third party (such as Google’s recently launched free music offering in China, Top100.cn); it may be bundled (such as in Nokia’s innovative ‘Comes With Music’ offering, which bundles the music fee into the actual handsets) or the payment may be part of an existing social, technological or cultural infrastructure (such as cable TV or European broadcast licence fees) and therefore absorbed without much further thought. Feels-like-free could therefore be understood as a smart way to re-package what people will pay for, so that the pain of parting with their money is removed or somewhat lessened – everyone pays, somehow, but the consumption itself feels like a good deal...."     Read on.  PDF: Download RSA - The price of freedom Gerd Leonhard July 2009

Related articles by Zemanta

• The Future of Music & Media: Gerd Leonhard at Plugg 2009 (blip.tv)